Apartment association · Tartu linn
Õpetaja tn 2 apartment association
Tartu linn, Õpetaja tn 2 korteriühistu (registry code 80006459) manages a 3-storey panel building built in 1959 with 12 flats. According to its 2025 annual report, the association's long-term liabilities were €86,559 (€135 per m² of flat space) and it held €27,593 in cash. Long-term liabilities have fallen 43% since 2019.
Board
- UTUlvi Toruboard member8 years 9 months
- House conditionaverage
- age, energy class and works done
- Loan affordabilitygood
- loan vs the association's annual income
- Cash bufferaverage
- cash next to the loan, 3-year average
- Managementgood
- reports filed on time
Building
- Built
- 1959
- Storeys
- 3
- Construction
- panel
- Flats
- 12
- Lift
- no
- Heating
- district heating
- A
- B
- C
- DDvalid until 17.04.2029
- E
- F
- G
- H
Compared with similar buildings: Tartu linn, built 1954–1964, panel (26 associations).
Finances by year
Loan principal repayment is an estimated €1.69 per m² of flat space a month, about €85 a month for a 50 m² flat (interest not included) — more than 96% of associations repaying a loan. The median is €0.52 in Estonia and €0.66 in Tartu linn. At the current pace the loan will be repaid around 2032.
| Year | Long-term liabilities | Short-term liabilities | Cash | Income | Labour costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | €86,559 | €7,946 | €27,593 | €15,722 | €0 |
| 2024 | €93,599 | €6,949 | €23,333 | €16,513 | €0 |
| 2023 | €112,696 | €7,509 | €21,058 | €15,250 | €0 |
| 2022 | €117,451 | €8,668 | €19,604 | €12,666 | €1,911 |
| 2021 | €136,398 | €9,167 | €16,747 | €12,417 | €2,151 |
| 2020 | €144,437 | €8,638 | €14,449 | €12,303 | €1,921 |
| 2019 | €152,070 | €8,301 | €14,775 | €12,654 | €1,685 |
Compared with similar buildings (Tartu linn, built 1954–1964, panel; 26 associations), long-term liabilities per m² of flat space are higher than 27% of them. The median for buildings with a loan is €183/m².
Flats in this building
No flat in this building has been for sale or rent in the last 12 months.
What is your flat worth?
An estimate for a flat at Õpetaja tn 2 from similar homes — free and instant.
Value your flatApartment associations nearby
| Grade | Building | Long-term liabilities | Cash | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | Filosoofi tn 2 // 41977 · 8 flats | €0 | €3,626 | 2025 |
| B | Filosoofi tn 51995 · 6 flats | €0 | €19,992 | 2024 |
| A | Vaksali tn 31970 · 55 flats | €178,155 | €44,980 | 2025 |
| B | Võru tn 54 // 561995 · 7 flats | €0 | €471 | 2025 |
| – | Võru tn 231977 · 6 flats | €0 | €5,100 | 2023 |
| B | Filosoofi tn 91977 · 5 flats | €0 | €4,150 | 2025 |
| – | Kastani tn 48g1961 | no reports | ||
| – | Kastani tn 48c1969 | no reports | ||
Frequently asked questions
Does the association have a loan?
According to its 2025 report, the association has €86,559 of long-term liabilities. The report's key figures do not separate a bank loan from a renovation grant — the association's own statement gives the exact loan balance.
How much cash does the association have?
At the end of 2025 the association held €27,593.
When was the building built?
According to the building register, it was first used in 1959 and has 3 storeys.
Who is on the association's board?
According to the business register, the board members are Ulvi Toru (board since 06.01.2018).
How is the association grade calculated?
The A–E grade is built from public data and compares the association with all apartment associations in Estonia. House condition (40%) takes the building's age into account – a new house needs no renovation – along with the energy certificate and the works on the building that its flats' sale ads describe (sellers' and brokers' unverified claims) – the more works (facade, roof, pipes, heating and so on), the better; in an older building, a loan taken for renovation also counts as investment. Loan affordability (30%) shows how many years of income the long-term liabilities equal – up to three years is entirely normal. Cash buffer (10%) is cash per m² of flat space averaged over the last three year-ends: without a loan a bigger buffer is better; with a loan a moderate one is enough. Management (20%) shows whether the last three years' reports were filed, and on time, with extra points for a professional manager. A loan is not bad in itself: in an older building it usually means the house has been renovated. The grade is updated weekly.
Where does the data come from?
Finances: business register open data (annual-report key figures, 2019–2025). Building: building register. Flats on offer: Leiamaakler.ee data from the property portals.